A. The connection anywhere between recombination volume and you may genetic length from inside the eukaryotes

Jevons, M. P., and Parker, M. T. (1964). J. din. Highway., 17, 243-250. Lidwell, 0. Yards. (1959). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 18,49-52. Alive, I., and you may Nichols, Good. C. (1961).J. shoot. Dis.,108, 195-204. Macdonald, An effective. (1946). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 5, 230-233. Meyer, W. (1966). Zentbl. Bukt. PurusitKde., I . Abt. Orig., 201,465-481. Meyer, W. (1967). J. Hyg., Camb., 65,439-447. Nakagawa, Yards. (1960). Jap. J. moist. Res., 8, 331-342. Oeding, P., and you may Williams, Roentgen. E. 0. (1958). step three. Hyg., Cumb., 56, 445-454. Pagano, J. S., Farrer, S. Meters., Plotkin, S. A great., Brachman, P. S., Fekety, F. R., and Pidcoe, V. (1960). Science, N.Y., 131, 927-928. Parker, Meters. T. (1966). For the “The fresh Scientific Base from Drug Yearly Comment” (J. P. Ross, ed.), pp. 157-173. School from London area, The Athlone Drive, London area. Parker, Yards. T., Todinson, A. J. H., and Williams, R. Age. 0. (1955). J. Hyg., Cumb., 53,458-473.

The brand new parasexual course and its own use in hereditary study

Pether, J. V. S. (1968).J. Hyg., C an effective d . , 66,605. Poole, P. Meters., and you can Baker, J. R. (1966). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 25, 116-123. Report (1959). Int. Bull. bact. Nomencl.,nine, 115-118. Statement (1963). Int. Bull. bact. Nomencl., thirteen, 119-122. Statement (1967). Int. Bull. buct. Nomencl., 17, 113-125. Declaration (1971). Int. Bull. syst. Buct., 21, 165, 167, 171. Rountree, P. Meters. (1959). J. gen. Microbiol., 20,620-633. Rountree, P. Yards., and you will Asheshov, Elizabeth. H. (1961). J. gen. Microbiol., twenty six, 111-122. Rountree, P. Yards., and you will Freeman, B. M. (1955). Med. J. Aust., 2, 157-161. Ruys, A beneficial. C., and you can Borst, J. (1959). Antonie wan Leeuwenhoek, twenty-five, 237-240. Seto, J. T., and you can Wilson, J. B. (1958). Have always been.step three. moist. Res., 19, 241-246. Smith, H. W. (1948a).J. Hyg., C u d . , 46,7681. Smith, H. W. (1948b);Jp. Road. Ther., 58, 179-188. Smith, H. W. (1954).J. Road. Buc

Tarr, H. An effective. (1958). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 17, 64-72. A. (1965). Veterinarian. Rec., 77 , 477-480. Wentworth, B., Romig, W. R., and you may Dixon, W. J. (1964). J. infect. Dis.,114, 179188.

Williams, Roentgen. Age. 0. (1957). Zentbl. Bakt. PurasitKde., I . Abt. Orig., 168, 528-532. Williams, Roentgen. E. O., and Jevons, Meters. P. (1961). Zentbl. Bukt. ParasitKde., I Abt. Orig., 181,349-358. Williams, R. E. O., and you can Rippon, J. Age. (1952). J. Hyg., Camb., fifty, 320-353. Williams, R. Age. O., Rippon, J. Elizabeth., and you will Dowsett, L. Yards. (1953). Lancet, i, 510-514. Wilson, G. S., and you will Atkinson, J. D. (1945). Lancet, we, 647-649.

Hereditary Data from inside the Small-bacteria DAVID Good. HOPWOOD John Znnes Institute, Norwikh, England We. Introduction . eleven. Segregation just like the Proof of Easy Genetic Manage . A beneficial. The genetic method to biology . B. The fresh new detection off segregation . 111. The foundation out of Hereditary Mapping . B. The new sequencing out of loci to your a great linkage map: multi-factor crosses C. Linkagegroups . D. Genetic fine-build . Elizabeth. Deletion mapping . IV. Useful Hereditary Evaluation . Good. Popularity assessment . Bplementation examination . C. Epistasis . V. Hereditary Data inside Eukaryotic Microorganisms . A beneficial. General considerations . step 1. dos. Tetrad study . B. Hereditary investigation specifically organisms 1. Aspergillus nidulans . . dos. Aspergillus niger and other “imperfect” fungus step 3. Neurospora crassa . 4. Other ascomycetes . 5. Yeasts . 6. Filamentous basidiomycetes . eight. Ustilago . 8. Chlamydomonas reinhardii . 9. Ciliates . ten. Slime moulds VI. Hereditary Research inside Prokaryotes . A great. General considerations . step one. Fertility versions and you may conjugational mapping . dos. Transduction and you may co-transduction . step 3. Transformation and you can co-sales cuatro. Non-selective analysis .

fifty 51 57 61 61 65 66 69 69 73 75 77 78 80 81 81 83 84 91 94

Watson, W

Hereditary study specifically bacteria step one. Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium or other Enteric bacteria . 2. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Ps. putida . step three. Bacillus subtilis cuatro. Streptmyces coelicolor or other actinomycetes . 5. Most other germs C. Official mapping actions separate out-of recombination VII. Genetic Research inside Worms A. Standard factors . step one. Version of viral genomes dos. Special features away from malware genes B. Hereditary study in particular worms step one. Bacteriophages 2. Creature worms step three. Bush viruses VIII. Concluding Comments Recommendations .